January 21, 2008
Microsoft says it’s OK to virtualize Vista Home
Posted Jan. 21, ’08, 4:25 PM PT by Thomas Gagnon-van Leeuwen
Category | Windows
If you’re one of the half-dozen people who’ve dreamed of running Windows Vista on your Mac, this news is for you. Remember how it was illegal to use any version but the $399 Ultimate with software like Parallels Desktop or VMWare Fusion? That’s history: Microsoft finally relented, and you’re now morally allowed to run Vista Home Basic ($199) or Home Premium ($239) in a Mac virtualization environment.
Not that you would want to.
Still, we’re happy to see Microsoft getting a little soft-hearted once in a while. Maybe Bill’s imminent departure is making other Redmond executives shed a tear or two.
3 Comments
Leave a comment
Recent Entries
About MacUser
MacUser is your source for news, info, and opinion about Apple, the Mac, and the iPod. Our dedicated team of bloggers covers everything that is relevant to Mac users — and, okay, some stuff that’s not quite relevant, but is still a lot of fun.
Subscribe/RSS
- Blog Posts
- Blog Comments
- Podcast (RSS) (iTunes)
Tip us off!
- Email: macuser [at] macuser [dot] com
Recent Comments 
- Aayush Arya on Hello, Apple 24 inch LED Cinema Display!
- JM on Don't get plugged by OSX.RSPlug.D
- instig8r on Snow Leopard to pounce in Q1 2009?
- Call Me Yo Daddy on Don't get plugged by OSX.RSPlug.D
- That70sGAdawg on Hello, Apple 24 inch LED Cinema Display!
- EJ on The Man in the Hat is back...and this time he brought his bricks
Categories
- Apple (233)
- Advertising (162)
- Events (235)
- Huh? (182)
- Humor (259)
- News (148)
- People (258)
- Rivals (404)
- Speculation (167)
- Steve Jobs (172)
- Stores (206)
- Apple TV (58)
- Business (451)
- Games (143)
- Geekery (459)
- Hardware (934)
- Accessories (78)
- Intel Macs (162)
- Ihnatko (18)
- Internet (461)
- Legal (243)
- MacUser (93)
- Macalope (7)
- Money (177)
- Music (344)
- Podcasting (100)
- Photography (74)
- Security (246)
- Software (1542)
- Updates (535)
- Tips (352)
- Troubleshooting (189)
- Video (403)
- Windows (219)
- iPhone (199)
- iPod (601)
- iPod Accessories (96)
- iPod Software (60)
- iTunes (128)
- iTunes Store (443)
Archives
- November 2008 (79)
- October 2008 (138)
- September 2008 (151)
- August 2008 (177)
- July 2008 (175)
- June 2008 (171)
- May 2008 (185)
- April 2008 (234)
- March 2008 (217)
- February 2008 (215)
- January 2008 (239)
- December 2007 (169)
- November 2007 (164)
- October 2007 (187)
- September 2007 (167)
- August 2007 (195)
- July 2007 (152)
- June 2007 (223)
- May 2007 (243)
- April 2007 (286)
- March 2007 (288)
- February 2007 (250)
- January 2007 (266)
- December 2006 (244)
- November 2006 (293)
- October 2006 (307)
- September 2006 (250)
- August 2006 (268)
- July 2006 (288)
- June 2006 (293)
- May 2006 (297)
- April 2006 (351)
- March 2006 (366)
- February 2006 (110)
- January 2006 (107)
- December 2005 (23)
Mac Publishing Sites
Links
we're all still waiting for o'l Jobs to allow Apple users to do the same thing with OSX...
It wouldn't really be Apple users wanting to virtualize OS X, but more pc users. Apple wont do it though, because they like to have a tight reign on their quality control. Once they allow OS X on any piece of hardware there goes their control of the experience.
Probably it finally dawned on MS that by allowing cheap(er) Vista to be virtualized they just might sell a few more copies. Dutch Schultz was right, those nickels and dimes do add up.