Good news. The next time you spend hundreds, or thousands, of dollars on the latest Apple product, you can blame the RDF. Up until recently, you might have gotten laughed at, but now you’ve got a Duke University and University of Waterloo study to back you up.
College students had two logos shown to them, an Apple and an IBM one. They were then prompted to think of uses for a brick. The Apple logo viewers were statistically more creative. The logo, it messes with your brain man.
“These experiments demonstrate that most any brand that has strong associations with particular traits could have the capacity to influence how we act,” Chartrand said.
Influence how we act? There we have it. I can’t help it. That logo appears and the synapses scream “BUY BUY BUY”. I just can’t ignore it anymore. That Airport Express was inexpensive, right?
[via Slashdot]
MacUser is your source for news, info, and opinion about Apple, the Mac, and the iPod. Our dedicated team of bloggers covers everything that is relevant to Mac users — and, okay, some stuff that’s not quite relevant, but is still a lot of fun. (Plus, we've got columns by Andy Ihnatko!)
IDG NETWORK:
JavaWorld
LinuxWorld
Macworld
Network World
PC World
PC World Canada
Playlist
Techworld
I have another theory..
what if people just gravitate to things they can associate with.
ie. creative people will pick creative professions do creative things, buy creative products etc.
That may partially explain why creative people buy apple products, but sounds like the subjects in the experiment were chosen at random. Seeing the apple logo somehow *made* them more creative... weird.
In response to that theory, this study was made by showing random people random logos - not showing creative people the apple logo and non-creative people the IBM logo.
To anonymous. I believe that your argument is likely correct for people who choose to use a particular brand (e.g. creative types tend to be more attracted to the Macs).
However, in this study, if the assignment of people to the groups was truly random, then the variances in the two groups (Apple Logo viewers and IBM viewers) would be expected to be equal and any difference in group could be attributed to the effect of the logo.
However, I would need to look at the research design. I imagine that a truly good study would need good random assignment, an ABACA crossover design and a believable placebo group.
Would make an interesting dissertation though. ;-)
Seth
Is Apple taking orders for the iBrick yet? I'll take 2!
So all I need to do is hang a large Apple logo in my workspace and I'll be more creative!