<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0"> 
  <channel> 
    <title>MacUser: Microfeed for "Photoshop online could be thrill-a-minute photo editing"</title> 
    <link>http://www.macuser.com/software/photoshop_online_could_be_thri.php</link> 
    <description>Comments for the entry "Photoshop online could be thrill-a-minute photo editing"</description> 
    <language>en-us</language> 
    <generator>Movable Type v3.34</generator> 
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
 
 
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:30:03 -08:00</lastBuildDate> 
 
     <item> 
      <title>Comment from John Dowdell</title> 
      <description><![CDATA[<p>If it's of help, then Photoshop Elements and Photoshop Album have been around since before Macromedia joined Adobe... Photoshop Lightroom was recently added for pro photographers' needs. The franchise is already a wide one.</p>

<p>There's a lot of imaging technology under development at Adobe, and a lot of Adobe-based workflows in the world today... one of the goals I see is to match available technologies to different types of audience needs, to create "a Photoshop for you" regardless of your particular situation and goals.</p>

<p>(I agree with you on the need to design around latency and other net-specific traits.)</p>

<p>jd/adobe</p>]]></description> 
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3813@http://www.macuser.com/#c58682</guid> 
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:30:03 -08:00</pubDate> 
    </item> 
 
  </channel> 
</rss>